Universo Marvel 3.0


Noticias: ¿Hay algún problema con el foro? ¿Tienes alguna sugerencia? Coméntalo aquí.
Bienvenido(a), Visitante. Por favor, ingresa o regístrate. 

Mostrar Mensajes

* Mensajes | Temas | Adjuntos

Esta sección te permite ver todos los posts escritos por este usuario. Ten en cuenta que sólo puedes ver los posts escritos en zonas a las que tienes acceso en este momento.

Mensajes - KaineParker

Páginas: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
Hay novedades jugosas, que aunque no suceden directamente en la cabecera de Spider-man, le afectan directamente.

Empecemos por lo que sucede en la colección del Capitán America:
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Y hoy se han filtrado algunas páginas del arranque de los Vengadores de Zdarsky:
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

2
Yo le tenía fe hasta que me enteré que los showrunners son los creadores de Euphoria.

3
No habia visto este hilo.
Llevo 3 capítulos. De momento bien. No esperaba gran cosa y me entretiene.
A ver si acierto la identidad de ese ser "femenino" misterioso.

Yo voy por el tercero también, pero creo que hace semanas, en una noticia que listaban el elenco de la serie, ya me destriparon el personaje misterioso.

4
Al contrario de lo que indicaban ciertos rumores de hace un par de semanas, Lanterns no ha sido renovada para una segunda temporada, de momento.

5
He leído el primer número de Vengadores: Armageddon, tras varios años sin seguir al equipo, y en líneas generales me ha gustado.

Lo bueno:
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Lo malo:
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

6
Las apuestas van a algo más cercano a los Secret Warriors de Hickman.

Osease... un Agentes de SHIELD 2.0. A ver si les sale.  :borracho:

De hecho, hay rumores del regreso de Coulson porque Clark Gregg compartió el anuncio de la serie en sus redes.

7
USA / Re:Cebulski al habla: Hilo de noticias USA (tercera parte)
« en: 08 Octubre, 2026, 12:01:41 pm »
Pues de nuevo Kaulso y yo 100% en desacuerdo :lol:

Dejo aquí unas interesantes declaraciones de Wacker respecto a sus planes para "arreglar" Marvel, todo suena de maravilla, pero a ver qué puede cumplir:
https://aiptcomics.com/2026/10/07/stephen-wacker-retailer-day-nycc/

Citar
Stephen Wacker addressed Marvel’s biggest criticisms at NYCC, outlining plans for fewer comics, a renewed focus on creators, less MCU

Stephen Wacker has heard the complaints about Marvel Comics. Too many books. Too many variant covers. Too much influence from the MCU. Strained relationships with creators. At New York Comic Con, Marvel’s new Editor-in-Chief made it clear he intends to address all of them.

It’s been no secret in the comic book industry that Marvel has been struggling for the last 2-3 years. They’ve been in a creative and sales malaise that has been discussed ad infinitum. People have been calling for big changes at the highest levels of Marvel Comics, and when they announced that Stephen Wacker would take over as Editor-in-Chief, many fans and insiders breathed a sigh of relief. Here was someone with a proven track record who could turn the ship around and send Marvel in the right direction.

Stephen Wacker presented the closing address at today’s Retailer Day. In short, Wacker addressed many of the issues and complaints that have plagued the publisher over the last couple of years. Anyone who has been down on Marvel can sleep a little easier tonight because Stephen Wacker has a plan and a vision to bring the publisher back to the forefront of the comics industry.

Wacker began by discussing his bona fides in the comic book industry, working in retail comic book stores in the ’80s and ’90s, and even going so far as to say he was the one fetching water for Todd McFarlane when he did signings at his shop.

Wacker said comic book owners have the hardest job in the comics industry. They’re ordering books three months in advance with no real sense of what will sell and what won’t. On top of that, the splintered distribution following the Diamond bankruptcy has multiplied their work two, three, or even four times. Even after all of that, they still have to show up every day and be excited about comics. They’re the ones selling books to every person who walks into their shop.

Wacker then went on to discuss the Marvel Summit that happened just yesterday. He hinted at massive happenings that were discussed. Wacker said there’s a lot of hunger for Marvel to figure out its way forward, and big changes are coming.

Marvel has been asking itself big questions, and the first Wacker discussed was, “Does Marvel publish too many comics?”

Does Marvel publish too many comics?

People have long observed that Marvel seems to have the most books on the shelves, and perhaps that is one of its strategies to outsell competitors. By taking up more shelf space, it can sell more comics.

Under Wacker, Marvel is going to be asking pointed questions about every new #1 issue it releases. They’ll decide whether the creators are 100% behind the idea and, if not, give them more time to get there. They’re going to ask themselves if they can get fully behind every #1 and give it the support it deserves.

Wacker admitted this could result in fewer books published.

Let that sink in for a second.

It’s quite remarkable that the new EIC of Marvel Comics is telling retailers that they’re going to publish fewer comics. But being in the crowd, I can tell you almost every new initiative or policy Wacker mentioned received applause.
Stephen Wacker has a plan to fix Marvel Comics

A new approach to launching comics

Wacker brought up the Midnight titles released today as an example of this new strategy. Even though the books were ushered in under the previous EIC, the idea of releasing three new books on the same day, and no other Marvel books this week, cemented this idea of putting the full weight of Marvel behind new releases.

Wacker talked about going to Midtown Comics on release day, talking to fans waiting in line for the new books, and the excitement he felt.

Other things Marvel did with the Midnight release to help retailers included letting them read issue #1 before final order cutoff dates. That way, they could get a sense of what the series was like and how it would sell in their stores.

Marvel also made the FOC for issue #2 after the release of issue #1, meaning retailers could see how the first issue sold before placing orders for the second.

What changes for variant covers

The next topic Wacker tackled was variant covers.

He admitted he was biased and really loved variant covers. He conceded that many readers also enjoy variant covers. For these reasons, they aren’t going away.

Wacker does worry about the overuse of variant covers to the point that it creates confusion about what the actual main cover of a comic is. He pointed out iconic covers of the past and how you could picture them in your mind, but when comics have so many variants, that iconic nature can be muddled.

From now on, Marvel will be clearer about main covers, adopting the industry standard of “Cover A, B, C, etc.” to denote main covers versus variants. Gone are the days of mindlessly throwing endless covers at every book.


Marvel Comics should lead the MCU, not follow it

Next, Wacker took on the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Marvel comic fans have long complained that the comics seem to be taking their cues from the wildly successful and popular movies. In an endless push for synergy between the movies and comics, the comics are altered to fit the cinematic universe. Many have felt that the tail has been wagging the dog.

Wacker pointed out that after moving to California, the comic offices would physically be in the same building as the movie offices. According to Wacker, the MCU’s success has created the assumption that the comics should relate to and match the films.

Wacker emphatically stated, “That is backwards.”

In his first meeting with Kevin Feige, Wacker was told that it’s not their job to follow the movies. To reinforce that, Feige attended the Marvel Summit yesterday in New York and told them their job was to be 15 years ahead of the cinematic universe.

Marvel Comics should be the creative engine.

Wacker added that the comics are clearly better when they lead, not follow.

Hard truths were spoken at the Marvel Summit.



Repairing relationships with creators

Next, Wacker addressed the publisher’s creative side.

He was frank in admitting that Marvel can’t compete with the feeling a creator gets from owning their own work. But they can offer creators a part in working on the biggest narrative story ever told.

To repair relationships with creators, Wacker brought up three main points: paying creators on time, backing them up when things get loud, and listening to their creative instincts and desires.

Wacker promised that next year we would see names on Marvel books that we have not seen in years, and in some cases ever. He does not believe in a house style and thinks the publisher will benefit from fresh, creative ideas.


Rethinking the physical comic

Finally, Wacker brought up the physicality of comics.

He wants to learn from manga, including its price, size, and content. It sounded like compact comics, like DC’s, were top of mind. The announcement of the new “Brick” paperbacks is part of these initiatives, but more is coming.

He also emphasized that digital comics should consider physical releases from day one. He reaffirmed that the market is built on physical products and Marvel will continue to focus on that.

Can Wacker turn Marvel around?


Marvel’s problems over the last two to three years have often been juxtaposed with the huge successes of DC Comics. Whether it’s the Absolute line, Compact Comics, or simply its successful All In main continuity books, it has certainly felt like DC was consistently delivering on all fronts. And many have seen Marvel floundering.

In my estimation, Stephen Wacker’s closing address at NYCC 2026’s Retailer Day felt like a response to nearly every major criticism and comparison to DC Comics that has been made over the last few years.

It seems clear that Wacker has heard the criticism and is taking concrete steps to rectify it.

He closed with the following:

“We cannot be the company that just protects trademarks for the greatest characters in comics history, or just adapts them for movies and TV shows. I want us to be the company that does something for you that’s unexpected, that you can then go hand-sell. I want readers to argue and debate Marvel stories. I want retailers excited about the Marvel boxes showing up from PRH. I want critics surprised by Marvel. I want competitors challenged by Marvel. I want kids discovering Marvel. And I want the rest of the entertainment business looking at our comics and thinking, ‘Crap, we need to catch up.’ That’s the Marvel comics that I and the new team want to build.”

Es todo muy coherente y suena bien... Apuesto que no cumplirá una tercera parte.

8
Pero entre insiders y simplemente ver las cosas que han pasado en sus pelis y series...Por ejemplo, está confirmadísimo por concep arts y leaks iniciales (que luego fueron confirmados por esos concept arts) que Spiderman iba a salir en Madame Web (en las visiones del futuro). Al final, no salió (bueno, técnicamente) y casualmente cortan el momento en que van a decir el.nombre del sobrino de Ben. Los fans , claro, sabemos quién es, pero se evita expresamente decir Peter.

Si no me equivoco, y también basado en los comentarios de insiders, el problema más gordo, y por lo que Feige se puso en plan cero menciones a Spider-Man o Peter, era que la película de Madame Web implicaba que estábamos viendo una precuela/historia de origen del Peter del MCU. Parece que no eran muy sutiles con los guiños y la visión de Cassandra.

Al ver la "jugarreta" de Sony, Feige amenazó con echarles a todos los abogados de Disney encima (con razón) y Sony recogió manguera. Desde entonces son hiper cuidadosos a meter cualquier referencia que se pueda tomar cómo una conexión al Spider-Man principal.

9
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

10
No es nada descabellado, por lo pronto por esta serie sabemos que es

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Y su currículum hasta ahora consiste en

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Por algún motivo no consigo que nadie me explique satisfactoriamente por qué se supone que John es un héroe. "Porque se ha esforzado mucho", nos ha jodido, ¿los villanos no se esfuerzan?  :lol:

Que por cierto, si yo fuese afroamericano no me haría ninguna gracia que la moraleja de una serie protagonizada por uno sea

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Bajo el prisma de Lanterns, a la gente del ICE hay que dejarla trabajar  :cafe:  y ser bueno es el nuevo punk rock, claro  :thumbup:

Me recalco sobre mi primer comentario al respecto del final:

Lindelof se marcó un final de Lost 2.0.

No sabía cómo resolver el misterio, hizo una chapuza y tratará de venderla cómo que lo importante era el desarrollo y evolución de las motivaciones de los personajes, cuando a poco que se analicen sus comportamientos y decisiones, la cosa hace aguas.

Y por cierto, hoy ví una crítica bastante acertada a la serie, en base al trato a Guy. Guy es un profesor de educación física, que ha sido un buen Lantern e incluso ha salvado muchas vidas al detener un genocidio.

Sin embargo John no para de menospreciarlo y lo hace de menos una y otra vez. El francotirador del ejército haciendo misiones de eliminación secretas se burla del tipo que educaba niños una y otra vez y se considera en un estándar moral superior a el.

Esto me llevó a pensar en el detalle de que Tom King es el otro guionista principal. No podía dejar la historia sin su parte de lamida de culo a sus antiguos compañeros de la CIA.

11
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

12
Cada día que pasa MrK y Mc se mimetizan más. No quiero ser malo pero se están pareciendo peligrosamente al dúo político que jamás compraría en el Lefties.  }:)

Yo no digo nada pero, ¿alguien los ha visto al mismo tiempo en el mismo lugar?

13
Lo de la resolución y las motivaciones son para prohibir acercarse a los guionistas a un teclado.

Yo voy a decir que, para mí, está serie deja bastante tocadas mis expectativas de cara al Gunnverso. Me parecieron productos mucho más honestos, con sus muchos fallos, la película de Supergirl o Creature Commandos, que este mal intento de historia seria y adulta.

14
Yo tenía muchas dudas sobre está serie. Ver que Lindelof era el productor me hacía temerme lo peor.
Pero, por otro lado, todo el mundo decía que había mejorado mucho desde Lost y la idea de dar un enfoque policíaco a los Green Lanterns me atraía.

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

15
Ha salido hoy una filtración sobre que Sony y Amazon están negociando su próxima serie del Spider-Verso, y que sería una adaptación de La saga de los clones.

Páginas: [1] 2 3 ... 7
Carbonate design by Bloc
variant: carbon
SMF 2.0.7 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines