De verdad que no quiero pensar mal, me gusta ver las razones y uno buscando, encuentra estas cosas. Aquí algunas de las críticas negativas:
Aquaman is more seawater than bongwater, unfortunately, but when it gets trippy, it floats within hailing distance of Doctor Strange.
¿Doctor Extraño? Pues sí, lo mete en la crítica.
A superhero movie with the scope of an epic but the spirit of a mischievous boy, "Aquaman" is a goofy, uneven adventure that proudly sticks to its loopy vision even if it doesn't quite work.
Aventura tonta. Curioso.
"Maybe Aquaman: Ragnarok is a better vibe for this film. It's so goddamn colorful, with Wan and company really leaning into this being an unabashed superhero film...I'm [just] not sure if there's enough here to truly latch on to."
Nada, que no le convence que sea una "película de supehéroes descarada".
In a better world, "Aquaman" would excel at delivering an ecological message to the masses. But all the fish in the sea can't salvage a movie that refuses to go more than surface deep.
Aquaman no es tan profunda como debe ser, falta "mensaje" ahí, pero... cuando valoro a Antman:
The essence of "Ant-Man" is inherently silly, and that's where the strength of the new movie lies.
(El mismo crítico exigiendo un entretenimiento "tonto" a una película de superhéroes y a otra una profundidad con mensaje ecológico).